In the same premium office laptop segment, yet the two processors follow two opposing philosophies. Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 5 340 is a showdown between Intel’s 14-core multitasking powerhouse and AMD’s 50 TOPS NPU, which meets the Copilot+ threshold. Hung Phat compares Notebookcheck benchmarks with current retail configurations to show you exactly where the differences lie.
Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 5 340: What are the differences?
The first difference lies in the core count. The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H architecture with 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning each core runs a single thread. The Ryzen AI 5 340 belongs to the Krackan Point group, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads, consisting of 3 Zen 5 cores and 3 Zen 5c cores. With the same default TDP of 28W, the two processors allocate their power budget in opposite directions.
Maximum clock speeds are very close. The Intel chip reaches 4.9 GHz, while the AMD chip reaches 4.8 GHz. Therefore, the actual difference comes not from frequency, but from the number of available cores and the NPU performance. The table below summarizes the specifications and Notebookcheck benchmark scores for both processors.
| Specifications | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H | Krackan Point, Zen 5 |
| Cores and Threads | 14 cores, 14 threads | 6 cores, 12 threads |
| Max Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Default TDP | 28W | 28W |
| Cinebench R23 Single/Multi-core | 1,969 / 14,629.5 | 1,915.5 / 12,532 |
| Geekbench 6 Single/Multi-core | 2,733 / 12,099 | 2,781.5 / 10,765 |
| PassMark | 28,281 | 19,584 |
| NPU | 13 TOPS | 50 TOPS |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics 130T | AMD Radeon 840M |
The table above shows that Intel leads in all aggregate CPU tests. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 16.7% difference, Geekbench 6 multi-core shows a 12.4% difference, and PassMark shows a massive 44.4% difference. In single-core performance, the results shift slightly, with AMD leading by 1.8% on Geekbench 6 and Intel leading by 2.8% on Cinebench R23.
The reverse is true for the NPU. The Core Ultra 5 225H only has 13 TOPS, which is below the 40 TOPS threshold set by Microsoft for Copilot+. On the other hand, AMD reaches 50 TOPS, exceeding that threshold. This is the key factor that makes these two processors in the same segment serve two different types of workloads.
Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen AI 5 340 under heavy multitasking
For tasks such as data compression, source code compilation, video rendering, or large spreadsheets, the multi-core advantage of the Core Ultra 5 225H is clearly evident. A margin of 12.4% to 16.7% is not a small number when tasks last for dozens of minutes. The chart below places three multi-core tests from both processors side-by-side.
Cinebench R23 multi-core recorded 14,629.5 points for Intel compared to 12,532 points for AMD. Geekbench 6 multi-core was 12,099 compared to 10,765. PassMark had the largest gap at 28,281 compared to 19,584. Since all three tests lean toward one side, the conclusion regarding high-intensity multitasking is quite solid.
However, this is aggregated data from various different machines. Power limits, thermal systems, and RAM configurations of each individual laptop still determine the final outcome. For the same Core Ultra 5 225H, a 16-inch machine with a larger cooling chamber will maintain higher clock speeds longer than a thin and light 13-inch machine.
How do integrated Arc 130T and Radeon 840M graphics differ?
Integrated graphics is the second battlefield. The Core Ultra 5 225H comes with Intel Arc Graphics 130T, achieving 5,299.5 points in Fire Strike and 2,378 points in Time Spy. The AMD chip’s Radeon 840M achieved 4,854 and 1,479 points, respectively. The gap is 9.2% in Fire Strike but as high as 60.8% in Time Spy.
When switching to actual gaming, the gap narrows. Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p High settings achieved 17.65 fps on Arc 130T and 15 fps on Radeon 840M. At Ultra settings, it was 15.8 fps compared to 12.2 fps. Both are below the threshold for smooth gameplay, so heavy gaming needs still require a laptop with a discrete GPU.
Notebookcheck data also shows something contrary to common assumptions. In Dota 2 at 1080p High, the Radeon 840M achieved 67.55 fps while the Arc 130T only reached 51.35 fps. In GTA V at High settings, it was 46.55 fps compared to 23.3 fps. Therefore, the graphical advantage of the Core Ultra 5 225H is not a universal rule for all games.
How many TOPS does the Core Ultra 5 225H NPU have compared to AMD’s 50 TOPS?
The NPU is the reason the Ryzen AI 5 340 exists in this product range. The 50 TOPS level exceeds the 40 TOPS threshold for Copilot+, allowing the machine to activate AI features running locally directly on the device. The Intel chip, with 13 TOPS, only supports Windows Studio Effects and software optimized via OpenVINO.
Official specifications confirm a 6-core, 12-thread configuration, a max clock speed of 4.8 GHz, Radeon 840M graphics, and a 50 TOPS NPU. You can verify this directly at the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 page.
If your work involves constant online meetings, background removal, eye contact correction, or running local AI models, the 50 TOPS threshold provides real-world value. If the software you are running does not yet utilize the NPU, this number does not translate into performance. That is when the multi-core advantage of the Core Ultra 5 225H becomes more worth considering.
Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Ultra 5 125H when upgrading from Meteor Lake
Many office machines currently run the Ultra 5 125H from the Meteor Lake generation, so a comparison with the new AMD version is worth noting when upgrading. The Ryzen AI 5 340 is 16.3% faster in Cinebench R23 single-core and 22.1% faster in Geekbench 6 single-core. This margin is noticeable when opening many browser tabs or heavy formula-laden spreadsheets.
Multi-core performance leans slightly toward the older Intel version, with 12,804.5 points in Cinebench R23 compared to 12,532, and 11,268 points in Geekbench 6 compared to 10,765. The most significant difference lies in the NPU, where Meteor Lake only reaches 11 TOPS while the AMD version reaches 50 TOPS, representing a difference in the availability of local AI features.
Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen AI 5 340 laptops at Hung Phat
The configuration running the Core Ultra 5 225H currently for sale is the Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 with 24GB DDR5 6400MHz, 512GB PCIe Gen 5 SSD, a 16-inch WUXGA 400 nit screen, and an 86Wh battery, priced at 35.5 million VND. The other two versions in this line use the Core Ultra 7 255H and are therefore outside the scope of this comparison.
This machine is suitable for professionals needing a large screen, enterprise-grade keyboard, and high RAM capacity from the start. You can confirm the configuration and stock status at the Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 (2025) page.
On the AMD side, the 340 version comes with 16GB LPDDR5x 7500MHz, 512GB PCIe Gen 4 SSD, Radeon 840M, a 14-inch 2K touch screen with 360-degree flip, and a 59Wh battery, priced at 22.5 million VND, found in the HP OmniBook X Flip Next Gen AI 14 (2025).
The 13 million VND difference between the two machines is not just about the processor. The ThinkPad features a 16-inch screen, an 86Wh battery, and an enterprise chassis, while the HP is a much lighter 14-inch 360-degree flip machine. Hung Phat recommends deciding based on the entire configuration rather than just the chip name.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the percentage difference between Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen AI 5 340?
In multi-core, the Core Ultra 5 225H is 16.7% faster in Cinebench R23 and 12.4% faster in Geekbench 6, while PassMark shows a 44.4% difference. In single-core, they are nearly equal, with the Ryzen AI 5 340 leading by 1.8% on Geekbench 6. The actual gap also depends on the power limits of each individual laptop.
Does the Ryzen AI 5 340 meet the Copilot+ standard while Intel does not?
The Ryzen AI 5 340 has a 50 TOPS NPU, which exceeds the 40 TOPS Copilot+ threshold. The Core Ultra 5 225H only reaches 13 TOPS, so it has not passed this threshold, although it can still run Windows Studio Effects. If local AI is your priority, you should verify the NPU numbers before purchasing.
Which Core Ultra 5 225H laptops are currently in stock?
Currently, we have the Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 4 with Core Ultra 5 225H, 24GB DDR5 6400MHz RAM, 512GB PCIe Gen 5 SSD, a 16-inch WUXGA screen, and an 86Wh battery, priced at 35.5 million VND. The other two configurations in this line run on the Core Ultra 7 255H; please select the correct option when ordering.
How well can the integrated graphics of these two chips handle gaming?
Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p High only reaches 17.65 fps with Arc 130T and 15 fps with Radeon 840M, which is not smooth enough. For light games like Dota 2 at High settings, the Radeon 840M achieves 67.55 fps and the Arc 130T achieves 51.35 fps. These two graphics solutions are suitable for casual entertainment but are not a replacement for a discrete GPU.
